選舉觀察計劃資訊頻道


Гео и язык канала: Китай, Китайский
Категория: не указана



Гео и язык канала
Китай, Китайский
Категория
не указана
Статистика
Фильтр публикаций




Our webpage is unavailable for the time being. Please do not try to access it for fear of hackers trying to steal users’ information from it. 選舉觀察計劃網站目前未能察看或使用,請不要嘗試登入,以免被不明人士盜取個人資料。


gistration and Electoral Office to review its administrative procedures to enhance transparency and efficiency with respect to applications to do exit polls.
5. The Electoral Affairs Commission and the Registration and Electoral Office should critically access the procedures designed to regulate the transfer of ballot boxes from the polling stations to the Central Counting Station, and to strengthen the training of electoral staff who are civil servants from different departments. The electoral management bodies are advised not to rule out the option of suspending the distribution of votes by electronic means when the conventional manual procedures are reliable and therefore widely respected.
6. The Electoral Affairs Commission and the Registration and Electoral Office should promote the voting procedures among voters early on in order to reduce the need to re-issue ballot papers to voters who think they have not indicated their choices on the ballot papers correctly.
7. The Electoral Affairs Commission and the Registration and Electoral Office should continue to pay attention to the public health issues amid the COVID pandemic to safeguard the health of all concerned.
8. Electronic vote-counting systems which were found erratic should be exchanged to avoid the unwanted and embarrassing delays in the future. Procedure-wise, authorities should not rule out the option of suspending electronic vote counts, returning to manual voting counting that is reliable and no less efficient must be kept as a viable alternative.
9. The EC elections have clearly failed to meet standards of a democratic election. Hong Kong people who were disenfranchised knew very little about the new electoral methods. Democratic backsliding and illiberal developments undermine the quality of governance in general. The next Hong Kong Special Administrative Region administration is advised to bring democratic reform back in.


s were basically the same. None of the messages mentioned ‘democracy’ or ‘democratic development’. From the perspective of electioneering, the overall quality of electoral competition was compromised when candidates were seen to have avoided politically sensitive topics throughout their campaigns and to present almost identical policy platforms from subsector to subsector.
Against this background, the EC elections became highly homogenous. Without mutual monitoring between campaign teams, it was found that many candidates alongside their campaign teams had conducted electoral activities with voters in the Non-canvassing Zones (NCZ) and on the premises where the polling stations were, such as greeting and thanking voters and taking photos themselves and with voters. Such irregularities and violations of non-compliance of the NCZ ensued from the lack of self-discipline, weak enforcement of the regulations by the electoral management body, as well as the political homogeneity of the teams of candidates.
Surveys conducted by the EOP team on the polling day in the vicinity of the polling stations discovered that there were significant differences of views on the election between the candidates and the ordinary residents who have no business in this election. Despite the highest ever level of voter turnout on the polling day, and despite the government’s unreserved endorsement of the new electoral methods, most Hong Kong people remained convinced and unimpressed. After all, Hong Kong has long embraced the ideal of having free and fair elections which promote political competition between uncensored political opinions.
While the 2021 EC elections have clearly failed to meet any standards of a free and fair election, EOP has carried out a systematic study in order to put forward the following recommendations for improvement:
1. The Registration and Electoral Office has adhered its antiquated practices which impose excessive restrictions with respect to public access to and inspection of the voter registration. Journalists have had to spend extra time and efforts to overcome such legal and administrative requirements as “time-limits per visit” and “no re-production of the information in any form on the spot” before they could gather enough data and information for their news stories. EOP advises the Electoral Affairs Commission and the Registration and Electoral Office to review the unhelpful regulations and practices, and replace them with a direct and simple mechanism for public access to the information of voter registration, as well as nomination forms of candidates, in order to enable members of the public, journalists and researchers to conduct comprehensive study into the EC elections. The authorities should introduce an online voter information enquiry system to allow wider access to the basic information of individual and corporate voters.
2. The Candidate Eligibility Review Committee disqualified two nominees for the Election Committee. Reasons were formally given, and no appeal was allowed. EOP urges the Committee to review the current practice, specifically to fully disclose the reasons behind the negative decisions, and allow the disqualified candidates to lodge an appeal.
3. The Registration and Electoral Office should take initiate to remind and inform candidates and relevant parties of the regulations related to the non-canvassing zones, enhancing their knowledge of the Guidelines on Election-related Activities in respect of the Election Committee Subsector Elections and Electoral Affairs Commission (Electoral Procedure) (Election Committee) Regulation (Cap.541I).
4. The electoral management authorities responsible for the 2021 EC elections did not give permission to any persons or organisations to conduct Exit Poll on the polling day. EOP is disappointed that its application to do so was rejected by the authorities, citing the pandemic and public health as primary concerns. with the decisions of rejection of inspecting polling stations and supporting training programs of observers. We urge the Re


--Executive Summary--

The Hong Kong Election Observation Project (EOP) is an independent scholarly platform based in civil society and the academia of Hong Kong. Its mission is to observe and evaluate local electoral management and processes, innovate networks of citywide election observation to monitor electoral integrity, and to promote election observation in the city. The goals of EOP are to observe the differences between local practices and international norms and standards, including but not limited to Universal Declaration of Human Rights, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Declaration of Principles of International Election Observation, to study the factors leading to of the deviations of electoral practices observed, to provide policy recommendations for improvements, and to advocate how electoral integrity and democratic development matter to the public at large.
EOP conducted a range of observation activities during the 2021 Election Committee Subsector Ordinary Elections (EC elections) and on the polling day of 19 September 2021. A team of 20 EOP Observers who received intensive training collected quantitative and qualitative data at the five polling stations. Observers gathered information about voting procedures, public order, activities of respective candidates and the electorate. At the same time, observers approached local residents, voters, and candidates in an attempt to understand their opinions on the elections systematically.
Generally speaking, the electoral base of the EC elections has been drastically narrowed down under the new arrangements, though the government officials repeatedly avoided the obvious question of representativeness. Many subsectors are now constituted partly by ex-officio members, who are by definition uncontested, and most of the seats available for elections across the 36 subsectors were returned uncontested because of the pre-election coordination between interested stakeholders. Combined with the absence of pro-democracy candidates due to the new Candidacy Eligibility Review System, the EC elections received very little public attention. As a result, the process and results of the elections were unable to alleviate the legitimacy crisis that has troubled the city’s government for decades.
To the extent that the new system was designed for reducing genuine competition, prior to the polling day on 19 September 2021, 603 seats were filled without contest in 23 of 36 subsectors. Together with the ex-officio members and members returned by nomination, which were designated by Beijing, 1,136 of 1,500 seats were taken without election, amounting to three quarters of the total seats in the EC (75.7%).
In the event, elections were held for a mere 364 seats in 13 subsectors, with 412 candidates cleared by the Candidate Eligibility Review Committee. However, competition was more like staged than truly free and fair. On average, only 1.13 candidates competed for a seat. 7 of the 13 subsectors concerned have less than 100 eligible voters: the smallest being the Legal Sector with 30 corporate voters. The biggest one, the Education Sector, had 1,750 corporate voters in total. For the Social Welfare Sector, which was seen to have ‘the fiercest competition’ with relatively larger number of candidates, had 144 eligible voters only. Not surprisingly, the canvassing activities were carried out not in public but behind closed doors. Even with a 100% turnout, the total number of valid voters amounted to a mere 4,889 ballots across the 13 subsectors.
During the short campaign stage of the election, 325 ex-officio members and 156 members returned by nomination did not submit any electoral message or platform. EOP observed that 148 candidates who were nominated to run for elections in 36 subsectors also failed to submit electoral messages in Chinese, while 22 of them provided electoral messages in English only.
EOP analysed the Chinese electoral messages in the nomination forms of 868 candidates. It found that the electoral messages of 29 campaign teams of candidate


【2021 Election Committee Subsector Election Ordinary Election Observation Report】
----------------------------
************************
Download Full Report:https://bit.ly/3BRqR8c
Download Executive Summary: https://bit.ly/3naNuyt
************************
----------------------------


【2021年選舉委員會界別分組一般選舉(2021年9月19日)觀察報告】
------------------------------------

- 摘要-

「選舉觀察計劃」乃獨立的民間學術平台,旨在全面檢視整個選舉過程,開發支援全港選舉觀察網絡,從而讓公民社會得以監察香港選舉過程,推動本地選舉觀察發展。本計劃的目標是根據國際標準和守則--包括但不限於《世界人權宣言》、《公民及政治權利國際公約》、《國際選舉觀察工作原則宣言》--並按照權威學術研究和海外選舉觀察的豐富實踐經驗,指出今次選舉哪些環節出現問題或與國際標準有異,並研究成因,提出改革建議,帶動公眾關心和肯定選舉公正對建設民主至關重要。

「選舉觀察計劃」完成對2021年選舉委員會界別分組選舉進行的觀察活動。20名觀察人員在較早前接受一次密集的培訓後分派到5個投票站,就投票流程、秩序、候選人及選民的活動採用定量及定質的資料蒐集。同時,我們特別在投票日嘗試更有系統地了解市民、選民及候選人對是次選舉的意見。

整體而言,雖然政府多番迴避選舉委員會代表性的問題,事實上在新的選舉安排下,選民資格已被大幅收窄,而各界別引入不是競選的當然委員,及經協調後大部份界別出現自動當選的現象,再加上資格審查制度下民主派已經絕跡,都足以解釋今日的選舉缺乏市民關注的焦點,其過程及結果皆無助處理長期困擾香港管治的認受性問題。

新制度設計不利競爭,令選舉規模大幅減少。未到9月19日的投票日,有603個選舉產生的席位出現「等額」情况,在36個界別分組中有23個組別的參選人會在毫無競爭下宣布自動當選,再加上「當然委員」和「指明團體提名」這兩類獲北京配給的席位,沒有競爭又不用投票的席位已經高達1,136個,即四分三席位 (75.7%)。

「有競爭」的13個界別有364席位,412人通過資格審查,大部分只是比獲分配的席位多出了一兩個候選人,平均僅 1.13 人爭 1 席。這13個界別中,有7個組別的選民人數不足100個,其中最少是法律界,只有30個團體選民。即使是選民最多的教育界都只有1,750個團體選民,被指「競爭最激烈」的社會福利界的選民只有144個選民而已,拉票活動都是閉門進行的,即使投票率百分百都只有4,889張選票。

選舉期間,325名「當然委員」及156名「指定團體提名委員」均沒有提供任何「選舉信息」。148名獲提名競逐36個分組界別「選舉産生」的委員的候選人均沒有在遞交提名表格時提供中文「選舉信息」,其中22名候選人僅提供英文「選舉信息」。

「選舉觀察計劃」分析868個候選人在遞交提名表格時提供的中文「選舉信息」,發現5個界別中,涉及29支團隊的候選人提供的中文「選舉信息」基本相同,幾乎涵蓋了所有868名候選人。不論是中文或是英文的「選舉信息」,沒有候選人提及「民主」或「民主發展」。從選舉角度而言,候選人避免敏感的政治話題,不同界別的政綱相若,選舉質素大不如前。

在這個背景下,今天的選舉出現高度同質性,而在缺乏候選團隊之間互相監督的情況下,我們發現大量候選人和他們的助選團人員在「禁止拉票區」及票站所在的建築物內歡迎選民、拜票、謝票及隨意拍照留念,造成了大規模不遵守守則的現象。

同時,我們初步發現,市民和候選人對是次選擇的態度迴異,即使整體投票率接近百分之百,又即使政府當局對選舉表達肯定的態度,恐怕依然說服不了香港佔大多數市民,因為他們一直沒有放棄追求一個開放自由、沒有政見篩選和希望見到有更大競爭的選舉。

即使2021年選舉委員會界別分組選舉明顯不符合普及而平等的基本原則,「選舉觀察計劃」在這次選舉中的責任在於有系統地觀察和整理相關的數據和資料,指出必須改變的地方,提出以下建議:

和過去的經歷一樣,選舉事務處對查閱選民登記資料設下過份嚴苛的限制。記者要用大量時間查冊,克服不少行政阻力,將選舉委員會內各分組內鮮為人知的細節疏理披露。「選舉觀察計劃」認為,選舉管理委員會及選舉事務處必須檢討現行的安排,用最直接和簡單的方法向公眾開放選民登記冊、各候選人及團隊的表格等基本的資料,讓市民、新聞界和學術更容易、更全面客觀及更有效率地了解選舉委員會的組合和背景。處方應考慮公開讓市民、記者、研究人員透過處方網站登記成為用戶,便可以取讀選民姓名、團體名稱、登記地址、登記日期等基本資料。

在這次選舉中,「資審會」裁定兩人不符選委會委員參選資格。「選舉觀察計劃」認為,「資審會」必須檢討現行的安排,審查結果的理據應公開,並允許參選人可上訴有關決定。

選舉事務處應主動注意並提醒候選人及有關人士禁止拉票區的設定,提升他們對於《選舉活動指引》《選舉委員會選舉程序規例》的認識。

2021年選舉委員會界別分組一般選舉沒有獲准進行票站調查的機構或人士。「選舉觀察計劃」對未獲准進行票站調查及能觀察培訓課程表示失望,並會繼續提出要求和建議,要求選舉事務處檢討申請票站調查批核時間過長問題。

選舉管理委員會及選舉事務處必須檢討票箱運輸速度過慢問題,並必須加強工作人員訓練週期及提升工作人員對於投票及點票安排的認識,不應該排除暫停電子分發選票。

選舉管理委員會及選舉事務處必須加強投票人教育及宣傳,減少填錯選票,要求重發的問題。

選舉管理委員會及選舉事務處必須繼續關注健康及防疫具體措施及流程的改變,及對工作人員、選民及候選人健康的保障。

電子點票技術問題需改善。為能提升點票效率,不應該排除暫停電子點票,改為人手點票。

整個選舉委員會選舉制度設計都不符合民主選舉的要求,絕大多數市民對於本次選舉了解甚少,香港民主發展停頓,向反方向大幅退步,下屆政府必須重新開始民主發展。


【2021年選舉委員會界別分組一般選舉(2021年9月19日)觀察報告】
-----------------------------------
******************************
報告全文下載:https://bit.ly/3BRqR8c
******************************
-----------------------------------


選舉觀察計劃日前(2021年9月19日)於各票站外除了觀察票站外整體運作,亦分別向投票人及選民提出進行問卷調查的邀請。

在投票進行的9小時內,我們的觀察員共接觸550人(市民:408人; 選民:142人)。當中,28.9%的市民及31%的投票人願意接受我們的邀請。

今日首先公佈一個簡單統計,比較兩個群組對選舉代表性的觀感:

「你認為是次選委會選舉能夠代表民意嗎?請由 1 至 10 的量尺中選取最合適的數字。1 代表完全不能夠代表民意,10 代表完全能夠代表民意。」

如圖所示,兩組受訪對象對今次選舉的代表性存在明顯分別。

首先,市民回應的平均分為3.67,而有份投票的選民的則為6.41。
而最明顯的分別就回答「不合格」分數(1-5分)比率的市民更高達78%,認為是次選舉代表性「合格」(6-10分)的則只有21%,更有超過三成市民只給最低的1分。相反,有61.4%投票人認為代表性「合格」、但亦有超過二成選民只給予5分或以下。

在選委會選舉期間,一直有不少社會人士及傳媒都有指出今屆選舉只有不足5,000人投票,更有1,126委員(76%)完全不由投票產生,很難說服公眾這是個有「廣泛代表性」的選舉,不過政府卻一直迴避問題、甚至有高官認為舉行選舉「不應追求人多」,強調「愛國者治港」最緊要。

選舉觀察計劃希望借現場蒐集嘅數據了解選民及在5個投票站附近的市民的意見。日後我們會進一步分析市民的制度認知,歡迎大家留意選舉觀察計劃的專頁和頻道。




【選舉觀察計劃就就選舉委員會界別分組選舉的聲明】

選舉觀察計劃今天(2021年9月19日)完成對選舉委員會界別分組選舉進行的觀察活動。

20名觀察人員在較早前接受一次密集的培訓後分派到5個投票站,就投票流程、秩序、候選人及選民的活動採用定量及定質的資料蒐集。同時,我們特別在投票日嘗試更有系統地了解市民、選民及候選人對是次選舉的意見。

整體而言,雖然政府多番迴避選舉委員會代表性的問題,事實上在新的選舉安排下,選民資格已被大幅收窄,而各界別引入不是競選的當然委員,及經協調後大部份界別出現自動當選的現象,再加上資格審查制度下民主派已經絕跡,都足以解釋今日的選舉缺乏市民關注的焦點,其過程及結果皆無助處理長期困擾香港管治的認受性問題。

在這個背景下,今天的選舉出現高度同質性,而在缺乏候選團隊之間互相監督的情況下,我們發現大量候選人和他們的助選團人員在禁止拉票區及票站所在的建築物內歡迎選民、拜票、謝票及隨意拍照留念。

選舉事務處應主動注意並提醒有關人士該等行為有違選舉指引及禁止拉票區的設定,而且肆意破壞規矩。我們相信,缺乏了不同政治立場的候選團隊互相監督,造成了今次大規模不遵守禁止拉票區守則的現象。

同時,我們初步發現,市民和候選人對是次選擇的態度迴異,即使整體投票率接近百分之百,又即使政府當局對選舉表達肯定的態度,恐怕依然說服不了香港佔大多數市民,因為他們一直沒有放棄追求一個開放自由、沒有政見篩選和希望見到有更大競爭的選舉。

我們值此感謝今天接受邀請的人士,及選舉事務處、各執法部門、場地管理人員,讓我們順利完成今天的觀察工作。

本計劃日內將公布研究結果及觀察報告。請各位留意!


2021年9月19日
(完)


【2021選舉委員會】
制度被修改後嘅 #選舉委員會 構成同產生方法都非常複雜。

嘗試簡單啲講,按《條例》原來指引,2021年選舉委員會委員產生方法有3種:
1. 當然委員:362席
2. 指定團體提名:156席
3. 選舉:982席
共:1,500席

下圖就分別記錄咗 「被裁定無效嘅提名」、「委員產生方式有變化」嘅席位,同埋「當然委員中空缺」嘅席位。

喺有15席人大/政協佔據咗嘅情況下,
1. 當然委員: 362 + 15 - 52(空缺) = 325席
2. 指定團體提名: 156席
3. 選舉 - 982 - 15 = 967席 ,但其實只有364席將由選舉產生。*

所以,2021年選委會總人數暫時應該只有1,449位。

(*注1: 今屆 #選委會選舉 戰況其實唔太激烈,只有364席可由選舉產生,其他界別分組都出現「等額」情況,即係可選席位及候選人名單數量一樣,無需選民投票而自動當選。)


#選舉委員會界別分組一般選舉 將於 #九月十九日 舉行。

選舉觀察計劃一直都有留意並記錄咗2016同2021年嘅分別。當中包括:席數及其改變、選民登記數字及其改變、提名表格數字及其改變,同一啲簡單計算(例:今屆最多有會幾多人可以投票呢?)。

有興趣的朋友可於下面提供嘅網頁下載完整excel file以作參考~

網址:hkeop.hk/downloads/
直接下載:hkeop.hk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/HKEOP_Election_Committee_-Subsector_Election_workbook_v1-1.xlsx

----------------------------------------------------------------
#Election_Committee_Subsector_Ordinary_Election will be held on #September_19th.

The Election Observation Project has been paying attention to and recording the difference between 2016 and 2021. These include: the number of seats and their changes, the number of voter registrations and their changes, the number of nomination forms and their changes, and some simple calculation (for example: what is the maximum number of voters that can cast their ballots in the election - given all submitted nominations are accepted).

If you are interested in more detailed versions, a detailed excel file can be found on our website: hkeop.hk/downloads/

Direct Download: hkeop.hk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/HKEOP_Election_Committee_-Subsector_Election_workbook_v1-1.xlsx


自動當選的,再加上「當然委員」和「指明團體提名」的,沒有競爭又不用投票,已經結束!排斥了民主派挑戰親政府力量的情況下,餘下的300個席位的投票,到底要比併的是什麼呢?大家不妨留意一下吧!




#蘋果日報 報導——選舉改制︱近6成人反對改制 學者料立選投票率低白票高 政府或卸膊個別政策(全文:https://hk.appledaily.com/local/20210507/LEXXRSFV2NG2XHLXUN4V6TA6KU/)
//本月初成功訪問逾7,300人的調查顯示,整體近6成人反對「完善」選舉制度,支持的僅佔3成,而反對立法禁止公開呼籲他人投白票等,亦有56%人反對。有學者估計,今年12月的立法會選舉投票率達4成已「執到身彩」,同時可能有大量白票、廢票,屆時政府會推說是市民不滿個別官員或政策所致。//

#信報 報導——民研:近六成人反對政府修改選舉制度(全文:https://www2.hkej.com/instantnews/current/article/2793766/%E6%B0%91%E7%A0%94%3A%E8%BF%91%E5%85%AD%E6%88%90%E4%BA%BA%E5%8F%8D%E5%B0%8D%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E4%BF%AE%E6%94%B9%E9%81%B8%E8%88%89%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6)
//浸會大學政治及國際關係學系副教授、比較管治及政策研究中心總監、選舉觀察計劃成員陳家洛提到,調查反映港人有自由意志,並非冷冰冰機器,而「非民主派」支持者亦非一面倒支持改制,反映改制排斥民主派「清理門戶」,但同時分裂「非民主派」人士,出現「分贓不均」的情況。至於當局將立法規管投白票情況,他認為來屆選舉部分民主派支持者會選擇不投票,料投票率最樂觀只得四成。//

#AppleDaily Article —— Hong Kong lawmakers plan to speed up bill passage, despite clear ‘no’ in new poll (Full Report: https://hk.appledaily.com/news/20210507/OCGKEKYPFFGYTKNZ7UJOYJZRW4/)
//The political system was shaken up in the name of national security, but the latest poll showcased Hong Kong people’s thinking regarding the changes, he said.
The LegCo election in December would see a record low voter turnout, predicted Kenneth Chan, an associate political science professor at Hong Kong Baptist University, adding that it would be “very fortunate” if the turnout exceeded 40%.
Pro-democracy supporters who do vote are likely to spoil their ballots even without mobilizing from activists or leaders because they would see no choice in the race, he said.//


亞洲自由選舉網絡 (ANFREL - Asian Network for Free Elections) 於五月三日的世界新聞自由日出版新書 — 「亞洲選舉的媒體報導: 問題、挑戰、與反思」。此書匯集亞洲多地如柬埔寨、香港、印度、印尼、緬甸、菲律賓,斯里蘭卡的記者及他們作選舉採訪的經驗。

#選舉觀察計劃 很榮幸為有關香港的經驗作出貢獻,該章討論了媒體環境和選舉舞台當前的境況。我們希望了解社會上不同持份者如何理解後國家安全法時代的選舉和新聞自由狀況,亦為此進行了專家訪談和小組意見調查(與 香港民意研究計劃合作)。

如果您有興趣了解其他亞洲國家的經驗和挑戰,也可以在ANFREL上找到整本書。

書章:https://hkeop.hk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Media-Reporting-of-Elections-in-Asia_Hong-Kong.pdf

全書: https://anfrel.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ANFREL_Media-Reporting-of-Elections-in-Asia_Issues-Challenges-and-Lessons.pdf

了解ANFREL: https://anfrel.org/
-------------------------------------------------------
Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) launched its new book "Media Reporting of Elections in Asia: Issues, Challenges and Lessons" on World Press Freedom Day, 3 May, 2021.

HKEOP is honoured to have contributed to a chapter on Hong Kong discussing the current media environment and electoral arena. Expert interviews and a panel survey (in collaboration with HKPORI) were conducted for the purpose of understanding how different stakeholders in the society perceive the state of future elections and press freedom in the post-National Security Law era. The book chapter is available for download.

If you are interested in learning about the experiences and challenges in other Asian countries, the full book is also accessible at ANFREL!

Article: https://hkeop.hk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Media-Reporting-of-Elections-in-Asia_Hong-Kong.pdf

Book: https://anfrel.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ANFREL_Media-Reporting-of-Elections-in-Asia_Issues-Challenges-and-Lessons.pdf

Learn more about ANFREL: https://anfrel.org/


[新書發佈+網上分享][Book launch + Webinar]

5月3日(星期一),亞洲自由選舉網絡(ANFREL)邀請了不同的亞洲講者為新書“𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗳 𝗘𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗔𝘀𝗶𝗮: 𝗜𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗲𝘀, 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗟𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗻𝘀”舉辦網上分享,講述不同媒體在選舉報導時的挑戰及經驗~

報名詳情:https://bit.ly/3aB3Evk

日期:5月3日
時間:16:00 (曼谷 15:00)

Join ANFREL at their book launch (“𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗳 𝗘𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗔𝘀𝗶𝗮: 𝗜𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗲𝘀, 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗟𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗻𝘀”) with speakers across Asia to discuss journalistic experience while covering elections!

To register: https://bit.ly/3aB3Evk

Date: May 3, 2020
Time: 16:00HKT (15:00 Bangkok)


Репост из: 立法會資訊頻道
《蘋果》委託的調查於4月7日至9日進行,成功訪問1,011位18歲或以上操粵語的香港居民。民調先詢問市民在2019年區選的投票立場,以區分受訪者的政治傾向,然後再詢問受訪者:「全國人大通過完善香港選舉制度後,你有多大機會喺下次 立法會選舉 中投票?」

結果顯示,42%選民稱再投票的機會大,40%市民指再投票的機會細。民主派包括本土派支持者中,則有58%表明再投票的機會細,表示機會大的只餘30%。

無論受訪者稱會否再投票,調查也會詢問受訪者,如果下次再去投票,有多大機會投白票或廢票?33%受訪者表示「機會大」,稱投白票或廢票「機會細」的受訪者為48%,即不足一半人;表示「一半半」則不足一成。今次調查中,只有1%受訪者稱,在2019年區選中投了白票或廢票。

在2019年的 區議會 選舉中,因每一選區均有民主派與建制派競爭,全港選民也可投票之下,高達294萬人投票,投票率達71.23%,投廢票、投白票的人數為12,097人,比率僅佔0.41%。
https://hk.appledaily.com/local/20210415/SOM56M4TDBHTDFOU7SMXYPR6MU/
#HK202104 #立法會選舉 #立法會 #區議會


Репост из: Stand News 立場新聞
【閹割選舉】10 高官兼任公職 被欽點做當然選委
有權指定「替身」代替 變相政府委任

報道:https://bit.ly/3dj6APc

政府將選舉制度改頭換面,多個法定機構及諮詢委員會的主席,將成為當然選委。不過房委會、城規會及醫療輔助隊等 10 個組織,主席及總監均為問責局長,以及需保持政治中立的發展局常秘、衞生署署長等高官。政府文件指主要官員和公務員不能成為當然選委,但他們「可指定另一名在有關團體內任職的人」代其擔任,令人選變相由政府委任。《立場》亦發現,相關機構的成員多由政府甚至特首委任公職,若他們再獲指定為當然選委,或構成利益衝突。

記者今早(14 日)向政制及內地事務局查詢,相關高官如何決定代替人選、有何機制等問題,正待回覆…

Показано 20 последних публикаций.

164

подписчиков
Статистика канала